9/22/2008 12:17:20 PM
All of them not a few or the other side, that is the trick; all of them are Liberals with no fight only criticism to fit in:
Who is this? What do they want? Beyond the point of redemption, dirty bomb?
• Big act and act even bigger
• Until they came along “argument” we
• Cost 30 trillion to make 10 trillion (who gets the final bill)
• Don’t worry its just their money
• Don’t worry its another endorsement
• The big ones always get away
• Do they anticipate a fight or not
• Nothing going on but an imaginary threat (politicians)
• Debt or Rich? Creating success or massive debt? Liberal or Conservatives?
• When another Osama reemerges and pops out of nowhere
• Immunity from whose church? Immunity because of whose church?
• Penchant for lying and immunity? Murder?
• Wishes military advantage except an official one?
• We will stop if you give up or stop?
• Don’t know anything but worse refuse to ask? Stalk us to help and on our side and nation to help?
• Will not win?
• Accent even when behind enemy lines? Who are you listening to for “burph-day.”
• A problem is “this problem is huge?” Who is not interested or aren’t?
• We need puppet governments still
• (GO READ RUSH LIMBAUGH FILES AND WHY HE IS STALKING ANN COULTER)
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity on politico.com and Ann Coulter “friends”:
• Politico.com an “imaginary threat”; helping by stalking us and no choice?
• Politico.com “Ann isn’t you interested?” Also, “you won the dung heap, how can you resist now, you win?” Why make this harder? How can you say no?
• Immunity from criticism when an imaginary threat? Just blame or all of this church?
• Banks acting risky and debt driven? Nobody is to blame? Nobody is guilty? Just too stupid to catch all the puppet regimes?
• They have a lot of fight in them? Don’t care about nonsense? Guilty? Powerful and those powerless?
• You know you want it also?
• NO MATTER WHO GETS KNOCKED OUT, THEY WILL ALWAYS BE REPRESENTED AND POWERFUL, THAT IS SUPERIOR AND THIS CHURCH; NOT INTERESTED? RESISTING? IMAGINARY THREAT? PAY FOR EVERYTHING? HAVE AN INSANE TIME? WHAT DEBT WE ARE RICH?
Monday, September 22, 2008
Saturday, September 20, 2008
THE DIRTY BOMB IS CONFIRMED! THEY WANT MORE... MORE ADVANTAGE
9/20/2008 3:27:46 AM
We have to go little by little to see how stupid and uneducated these takers are threatening. What is their breaking point or do they even have one? The kidnapping part and how it exists right under their watch is the most incredible thing you will ever hear.
I will make this real clear, when things go wrong for them, they strike. They do not get out of your life or abide by the rules or even consider they may have an obligation instead of others, what they do is strike out. That is existentialism and the basis of it. We been playing this game for over 10 years now and it is time we get some real answers and results. We can start with both my life and Ann Coulter's life. Stop saying how we are set, we are trapped and stuck in a war which has surrounded us and striking the nation. You cannot come in or come out. They are doing this to Ann at this time and we can give examples. We will keep playing this game to see how long it is going to last and who is so blind and so out of reality; they are just sitting there on their desk while all of this goes down.
They will strike when things do not go right and things are not going right. You see recently with Ann site being down and the error message. You see this with 40 deactivated accounts on politico.com while they made her beg to return to win their wet t shirt contest for the conservative bunch. You see this with the use of a tazer satellite for 3 months on my hand and how painful that is, but that is nothing. Sometimes 20 seconds and when you cannot even feel your hand and hold anything. Then you cannot even work a mouse. Now try getting hit and pretending it is not happening 10 times a day for 3 months. Mr. President are you aware of what is happening and who has a gun to our head or what they want?
You see this problem with being buried by legal problems and monthly subpoenas. You see this with stomping on the floor and have it traced to Rush and Hillary or Osama; those three get a floor stomping. Now we get the entire state of California deciding they will block the server of Ann Coulter to be a protest against me.
We will make this real clear for the President, the public, the state of California, the liberals, the left wing, the communist, and anybody else who wishes to step forward and take responsibility; we know. It is so blatant; we want names and coordinates that is if we do not keep on getting arrested or having our personal life turned upside down by the same stalkers wishing to scare our family. They know and are confident on a battle with the military. They do not even fear it. You want to remove and get our troops as far away from the military bases as you can. The FBI has told us they have a strike plan. They will be kept in the dark and this game is going to drag on and on while these politicians and president makes these hollow speeches.
They got and are using the latest satellites on us at this time. That is how far up they are. That is how big this is. They are not scared of military intervention for a reason and that reason is they have a strike plan and a first strike. They will take the first strike when moved on. You better put your foot down and start getting rid of each and every one of them. They will take the first strike or block and torture us with the latest weapons in order to block unofficially this political plot. Their problem is they are undedicated and are hiding. They are angry they cannot reproduce even if we can agree they should not until we see improvement and vast improvements.
We have never seen so much insanity in ten years of a human life either in Ann Coulter's life or my life. Every single day they feel you are a messiah and obligated to them. This is why they must be interned unless we get the militant wing and the operation center of this plot. We also see President Bush working day and night on this but nothing. We cannot seem to break them or get them out of our life; we are obligated to their stupidity and are being judged for being smarter and more perfect. It is a form of harassment and they will take the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and so on for ten to twenty years if necessary. Their militant wing has already hit. They will hit again and as hard as they are official. This means their hail marry is a last minute dirty word. Want to know who is going to get blamed?
Certainly not the people behind this, it’s been 10 years and 2 false arrests, 8 stolen years and a life so worthless it’s insane. Ann and I have seen more insanity in our life than an entire lifetime. What does that tell you about these people and what they are up to? Superior? Can do better? We are obligated? Say military and then say dirty bomb. Think they are worried one bit? I did not see this or felt it; they just took out and are reading our emails. They are still banning us all over the web sites and reading our emails and love letters while getting so jealous and full of rage. Scared of the military and criminally insane? Someone needs to do a drug test immediately to find out what is in the drinking water.
Ask why they are not even scared of the military or the least bit scared of being caught? Ask why they feel they got the military beat already when the facts are clear and so obvious. The FBI is right; they got the dirty bomb and plan a first strike. This is the only thing which will equalize a domestic threat of an official nature. This is not an official threat. None of it is written down or able to be traced. It is like dealing with the Klan but this is about liberalism and communism. This is about jobs. This is about free health care.
They will keep this up until we break and "stop" opposing them. They did hit Ann also with a satellite once to spook her and she told me while talking to me. That means we both got it at the same time. How in the world is the President going to explain that one and all these reports before he says what Ann says, "you can rape me but you will never take me alive trying." They are not going to stop or get out of our life obviously but they are not willing to tell the truth or give the coordinates and names we need to focus on. We know we are walking into a trap and that is why they are kept in the dark about this. Well, lights on, what now? Keep lying and do nothing and blame it on the right wing or the conservatives? That just occurred but they never got a pardon only worse off now.
I am glad you are fixing your side. What about our side and fixing the strikes when we tell you to get your act together? Fix your side and leave us in a state of disrepair or being tortured by liberal churches who feel we are the messiah and are obligated to them. That is almost rape and most will say you will not take us alive so long as you are a traitor. I do not see much fixed but I do not have the coordinates or name I am asking for, yet. I need names and I need coordinates of this strike on us and the nation so we can have commandos check it out and investigate this dirty bomb, we know. Don’t be playing any game or lie to our face and torture us or read our emails. That is a traitor of the worst kind.
Cyber Warfare HQ
Ann will say the same thing and she knows their game, but she does not have a dirty bomb or is threatening this nation, she is a military spouse. She is already in a relationship so her family life is being threatened by people blocking and torturing us to advance this dirty bomb and coming strike. Move the commandos in place and be real quiet about it and do it quickly so I can email her please. Do you think they will just roll over or be captured if they are already over their heads? Where are they going to go? Fire all of them if you have to, not some scapegoat. You know it is that church and you know they have help from all over the world.
For more on the dirty bomb, click on the Rush Limbaugh section on profile.
We have to go little by little to see how stupid and uneducated these takers are threatening. What is their breaking point or do they even have one? The kidnapping part and how it exists right under their watch is the most incredible thing you will ever hear.
I will make this real clear, when things go wrong for them, they strike. They do not get out of your life or abide by the rules or even consider they may have an obligation instead of others, what they do is strike out. That is existentialism and the basis of it. We been playing this game for over 10 years now and it is time we get some real answers and results. We can start with both my life and Ann Coulter's life. Stop saying how we are set, we are trapped and stuck in a war which has surrounded us and striking the nation. You cannot come in or come out. They are doing this to Ann at this time and we can give examples. We will keep playing this game to see how long it is going to last and who is so blind and so out of reality; they are just sitting there on their desk while all of this goes down.
They will strike when things do not go right and things are not going right. You see recently with Ann site being down and the error message. You see this with 40 deactivated accounts on politico.com while they made her beg to return to win their wet t shirt contest for the conservative bunch. You see this with the use of a tazer satellite for 3 months on my hand and how painful that is, but that is nothing. Sometimes 20 seconds and when you cannot even feel your hand and hold anything. Then you cannot even work a mouse. Now try getting hit and pretending it is not happening 10 times a day for 3 months. Mr. President are you aware of what is happening and who has a gun to our head or what they want?
You see this problem with being buried by legal problems and monthly subpoenas. You see this with stomping on the floor and have it traced to Rush and Hillary or Osama; those three get a floor stomping. Now we get the entire state of California deciding they will block the server of Ann Coulter to be a protest against me.
We will make this real clear for the President, the public, the state of California, the liberals, the left wing, the communist, and anybody else who wishes to step forward and take responsibility; we know. It is so blatant; we want names and coordinates that is if we do not keep on getting arrested or having our personal life turned upside down by the same stalkers wishing to scare our family. They know and are confident on a battle with the military. They do not even fear it. You want to remove and get our troops as far away from the military bases as you can. The FBI has told us they have a strike plan. They will be kept in the dark and this game is going to drag on and on while these politicians and president makes these hollow speeches.
They got and are using the latest satellites on us at this time. That is how far up they are. That is how big this is. They are not scared of military intervention for a reason and that reason is they have a strike plan and a first strike. They will take the first strike when moved on. You better put your foot down and start getting rid of each and every one of them. They will take the first strike or block and torture us with the latest weapons in order to block unofficially this political plot. Their problem is they are undedicated and are hiding. They are angry they cannot reproduce even if we can agree they should not until we see improvement and vast improvements.
We have never seen so much insanity in ten years of a human life either in Ann Coulter's life or my life. Every single day they feel you are a messiah and obligated to them. This is why they must be interned unless we get the militant wing and the operation center of this plot. We also see President Bush working day and night on this but nothing. We cannot seem to break them or get them out of our life; we are obligated to their stupidity and are being judged for being smarter and more perfect. It is a form of harassment and they will take the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and so on for ten to twenty years if necessary. Their militant wing has already hit. They will hit again and as hard as they are official. This means their hail marry is a last minute dirty word. Want to know who is going to get blamed?
Certainly not the people behind this, it’s been 10 years and 2 false arrests, 8 stolen years and a life so worthless it’s insane. Ann and I have seen more insanity in our life than an entire lifetime. What does that tell you about these people and what they are up to? Superior? Can do better? We are obligated? Say military and then say dirty bomb. Think they are worried one bit? I did not see this or felt it; they just took out and are reading our emails. They are still banning us all over the web sites and reading our emails and love letters while getting so jealous and full of rage. Scared of the military and criminally insane? Someone needs to do a drug test immediately to find out what is in the drinking water.
Ask why they are not even scared of the military or the least bit scared of being caught? Ask why they feel they got the military beat already when the facts are clear and so obvious. The FBI is right; they got the dirty bomb and plan a first strike. This is the only thing which will equalize a domestic threat of an official nature. This is not an official threat. None of it is written down or able to be traced. It is like dealing with the Klan but this is about liberalism and communism. This is about jobs. This is about free health care.
They will keep this up until we break and "stop" opposing them. They did hit Ann also with a satellite once to spook her and she told me while talking to me. That means we both got it at the same time. How in the world is the President going to explain that one and all these reports before he says what Ann says, "you can rape me but you will never take me alive trying." They are not going to stop or get out of our life obviously but they are not willing to tell the truth or give the coordinates and names we need to focus on. We know we are walking into a trap and that is why they are kept in the dark about this. Well, lights on, what now? Keep lying and do nothing and blame it on the right wing or the conservatives? That just occurred but they never got a pardon only worse off now.
I am glad you are fixing your side. What about our side and fixing the strikes when we tell you to get your act together? Fix your side and leave us in a state of disrepair or being tortured by liberal churches who feel we are the messiah and are obligated to them. That is almost rape and most will say you will not take us alive so long as you are a traitor. I do not see much fixed but I do not have the coordinates or name I am asking for, yet. I need names and I need coordinates of this strike on us and the nation so we can have commandos check it out and investigate this dirty bomb, we know. Don’t be playing any game or lie to our face and torture us or read our emails. That is a traitor of the worst kind.
Cyber Warfare HQ
Ann will say the same thing and she knows their game, but she does not have a dirty bomb or is threatening this nation, she is a military spouse. She is already in a relationship so her family life is being threatened by people blocking and torturing us to advance this dirty bomb and coming strike. Move the commandos in place and be real quiet about it and do it quickly so I can email her please. Do you think they will just roll over or be captured if they are already over their heads? Where are they going to go? Fire all of them if you have to, not some scapegoat. You know it is that church and you know they have help from all over the world.
For more on the dirty bomb, click on the Rush Limbaugh section on profile.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
A LETTER TO ANN ABOUT STALKERS AND BAD FRIENDS OR... UM... OK... WAIT A MINUTE HERE
Ann, hi sweetheart;
ok I do not get it, the Palin in church speech had the volume all messed up and it seemed as if she was yelling in my ear and if I turned it down I would not hear what she was saying. So the audio was just crap.
I personally need to read the speech, haven't got a clue what that was about and never saw an old preacher cry while saying a prayer about Jesus Christ. That was strange. I think she was trying to say that Jesus was oil and therefore, Jesus was Alaska. Is this right? Is that what you wanted me to listen to or see?
Lisa De Pasquale is your enemy and stalker Ann. There is no doubt her and Rush Limbaugh got some diabolical plot to take you hostage or something. Read her stuff, every single article is something about you:
1. Moonbat = criticizing bush
2. Phyllis scholarly is about you
3. Deja view is about how she kicked you out of cpac or "gone too far" or third base with her
4. Then there was her interview where I was struck by an image of her as a cute college cutie or a soft cutie hogtie
5. It is like a deranged stalker who is John Hinckley' in you... but do not like you because she is not welcomed (Rush Liberal syndrome)... these people do not believe in domestic problems, only external problems or international enemies, that is why they are deranged.
If you read her recent articles, they are all about Osama. Who else do we know does this? Rush Liberal. Now, who have I been having so much trouble with and is obsessed with you like a leather with apple in mouth dominatrix hiding behind a BBW mask? Yes, our trusty friends who likes to hold us down because we revolt against their success while we scream insults such as "loser get lost and leave us alone you damn stalker, nobody is interested."
I would be very careful and understand they are in striking distance. Also, my first problem at work was with Sprint PCS, when cell phones hit big in 1999. Where are they from? The entire staff was black, the entire staff and they are all fat, ugly, and very determined to prove themselves as "superior" and friends to any minority cause.
Lisa does not know you are writing to me also. I am your pen pal which is similar to how Phyllis met her bubba. This is scary and freaks me out and these people freak me out, are they from the Ozarks and like the movie "Deliverance?" These people are offended very easily and will not accept no. Yet they are domineering and grow on you. Why in the world would they think you are their toy?
This is nuts. Now Rush is lying and making all kinds of excuses on his show. He is not being properly challenged. It all ends up making the left look bright and shiny that is the end result. This is why I said this is nothing but a pain in the ass. These people are jackasses or some cannibal colony. My Midwest theory was correct and they were linked somehow to the eastern liberals; but I could not figure out how or why.
So if we have to sue for the victory of World War III and not satisfied with these people or why they are on our team, who do we complain to or sue? Why is my life so badly missing and yours so badly out of place also? If they mess me up, they mess us up. If they mess us up, they mess up World War III and we have a problem. So why are they messing with either of us and why is no not good enough? Can you tell me or anybody tell me what the hell is the problem with these people and why they kicked us off politico.com and is promoting it now? 35 accounts is the total number of times they said "get lost" just so they could prevent you and me from emailing and now they are bragging about it on their shows and Lisa De Pasquale is also bragging on her columns. It is like a giant monster who is breathing down our necks and an ugly one also. This is scary stuff...
Cyber Warfare HQ
ok I do not get it, the Palin in church speech had the volume all messed up and it seemed as if she was yelling in my ear and if I turned it down I would not hear what she was saying. So the audio was just crap.
I personally need to read the speech, haven't got a clue what that was about and never saw an old preacher cry while saying a prayer about Jesus Christ. That was strange. I think she was trying to say that Jesus was oil and therefore, Jesus was Alaska. Is this right? Is that what you wanted me to listen to or see?
Lisa De Pasquale is your enemy and stalker Ann. There is no doubt her and Rush Limbaugh got some diabolical plot to take you hostage or something. Read her stuff, every single article is something about you:
1. Moonbat = criticizing bush
2. Phyllis scholarly is about you
3. Deja view is about how she kicked you out of cpac or "gone too far" or third base with her
4. Then there was her interview where I was struck by an image of her as a cute college cutie or a soft cutie hogtie
5. It is like a deranged stalker who is John Hinckley' in you... but do not like you because she is not welcomed (Rush Liberal syndrome)... these people do not believe in domestic problems, only external problems or international enemies, that is why they are deranged.
If you read her recent articles, they are all about Osama. Who else do we know does this? Rush Liberal. Now, who have I been having so much trouble with and is obsessed with you like a leather with apple in mouth dominatrix hiding behind a BBW mask? Yes, our trusty friends who likes to hold us down because we revolt against their success while we scream insults such as "loser get lost and leave us alone you damn stalker, nobody is interested."
I would be very careful and understand they are in striking distance. Also, my first problem at work was with Sprint PCS, when cell phones hit big in 1999. Where are they from? The entire staff was black, the entire staff and they are all fat, ugly, and very determined to prove themselves as "superior" and friends to any minority cause.
Lisa does not know you are writing to me also. I am your pen pal which is similar to how Phyllis met her bubba. This is scary and freaks me out and these people freak me out, are they from the Ozarks and like the movie "Deliverance?" These people are offended very easily and will not accept no. Yet they are domineering and grow on you. Why in the world would they think you are their toy?
This is nuts. Now Rush is lying and making all kinds of excuses on his show. He is not being properly challenged. It all ends up making the left look bright and shiny that is the end result. This is why I said this is nothing but a pain in the ass. These people are jackasses or some cannibal colony. My Midwest theory was correct and they were linked somehow to the eastern liberals; but I could not figure out how or why.
So if we have to sue for the victory of World War III and not satisfied with these people or why they are on our team, who do we complain to or sue? Why is my life so badly missing and yours so badly out of place also? If they mess me up, they mess us up. If they mess us up, they mess up World War III and we have a problem. So why are they messing with either of us and why is no not good enough? Can you tell me or anybody tell me what the hell is the problem with these people and why they kicked us off politico.com and is promoting it now? 35 accounts is the total number of times they said "get lost" just so they could prevent you and me from emailing and now they are bragging about it on their shows and Lisa De Pasquale is also bragging on her columns. It is like a giant monster who is breathing down our necks and an ugly one also. This is scary stuff...
Cyber Warfare HQ
Thursday, September 4, 2008
TO: KRISTEN BREITWEISER AND THE 9-11 WIDOWS (YOU WAKE UP ONE MORNING AND... THEN YOU KNOW YOU MUST... )
9/4/2008 10:53:27 PM
To Kristen Breitweiser: “Kudos to Ann Coulter”
After watching the interview on Good Morning America, “What she is doing is… why I wrote the book, to inspire every American… to have your voice heard… doesn’t feel you have a right to an opinion… I hope she never knows what it is like, to watch your husband get murdered on live television… to be barred to having access to answers… that is why we did what we did… that was what our goals were and our motives pure.”
Ms. Breitweiser, as the person with Ann Coulters’ dossier; you owe her a simple thank you by singling you out and making you fight. Ann knows exactly what it feels like and how it all crashes down in a snap of a finger. To be on the other end during an attack and to hear screaming and yelling or battle plans. You cannot do what we do if you do not know what it is like or how to fight. Read this page and do not throw yourself at someone, her motive is to get you to defend yourself and fight for yourself when nobody else will or can.
Cyber Warfare HQ
You will find the answers on this blog and remember it is an insult to throw you at the feet of professional soldiers; it makes them angry. Take what you need to do what you must, and the rest can be taken to the grave when you are done. You will find that Ann is three times the woman you are; so leave it there. You will find that in hell, your best friend is yourself and silence is both your friend and enemy. Ann is as professional as they come and has over 20 years in this; understand you are only a rank amateur who may need a little help from the almighty himself.
To Kristen Breitweiser: “Kudos to Ann Coulter”
After watching the interview on Good Morning America, “What she is doing is… why I wrote the book, to inspire every American… to have your voice heard… doesn’t feel you have a right to an opinion… I hope she never knows what it is like, to watch your husband get murdered on live television… to be barred to having access to answers… that is why we did what we did… that was what our goals were and our motives pure.”
Ms. Breitweiser, as the person with Ann Coulters’ dossier; you owe her a simple thank you by singling you out and making you fight. Ann knows exactly what it feels like and how it all crashes down in a snap of a finger. To be on the other end during an attack and to hear screaming and yelling or battle plans. You cannot do what we do if you do not know what it is like or how to fight. Read this page and do not throw yourself at someone, her motive is to get you to defend yourself and fight for yourself when nobody else will or can.
Cyber Warfare HQ
You will find the answers on this blog and remember it is an insult to throw you at the feet of professional soldiers; it makes them angry. Take what you need to do what you must, and the rest can be taken to the grave when you are done. You will find that Ann is three times the woman you are; so leave it there. You will find that in hell, your best friend is yourself and silence is both your friend and enemy. Ann is as professional as they come and has over 20 years in this; understand you are only a rank amateur who may need a little help from the almighty himself.
Sunday, August 17, 2008
ANN COULTER IS HAVING SEX WITH USAMBA BIN ROTTEN
SDI: was the largest and most influential radical student organization of the 1960s. At its inception in 1960, there were just a few dozen members, inspired by the civil rights movement and initially concerned with equality, economic justice, peace, and participatory democracy. With the escalation of the Vietnam War, SDS grew rapidly as young people protested the destruction wrought by the US government and military. Polite protest turned into stronger and more determined resistance as rage and frustration increased all across the country.
• Documents
•
• Vietnam War
•
• Free Speech Movement (Berkeley), 1964. Extensive archives collection.
•
• Columbia University
•
• Kent State
•
• Other locations
•
• Weatherman/Weather Underground
•
• Books
•
• Movies
•
• SDS Graphics
•
• German SDS
•
http://www.sds.revolt.org/
_______________________________
* Radical student group during the 1960s
* Spearheaded the Anti-Vietnam War movement
* Was transformed into Weatherman, a terrorist cult
Forming the core of the 1960s counter-cultural movement known collectively as the New Left, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was a radical organization that aspired to overthrow America's democratic institutions, remake its government in a Marxist image, and help America's enemies defeat her sons on the battlefield in Vietnam. The group developed from the Student League for Industrial Democracy, the youth branch of the socialist League for Industrial Democracy.
Established in late 1959 by Aryeh Neier (Director of the socialist League for Industrial Democracy), SDS held its first meeting in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1960. Its first President was Alan Haber, and its first impress on the political landscape was the Port Huron Statement of 1962, drafted principally by Tom Hayden, a former editor of the University of Michigan's student newspaper. The Port Huron Statement adopted the position of "anti-anti-Communism," refusing to support the West in the Cold War. The statement denounced bigotry in the United States, world hunger and American abundance, materialism, personal alienation, industrialization, the threat of nuclear war, military spending, and the Cold War. Its prescribed solution to Cold War tensions reads as follows:
"Universal controlled disarmament must replace deterrence and arms control as the [American] national defense goal. ... It is necessary that America make disarmament, not nuclear deterrence, 'credible' to the Soviets and to the world. That is, disarmament should be continually avowed as a national goal; concrete plans should be presented at conference tables."
Calling for "participatory democracy," the Port Huron Statement continued: "[The] allocation of resources must be based on social needs. A truly 'public sector' must be established, and its nature debated and planned. At present the majority of America's 'public sector,' the largest part of our public spending is for the military. When great social needs are so pressing, our concept of 'government spending is wrapped up in the 'permanent war economy.'" The Statement promoted the politicization of the University, a call that was answered in Berkeley's Free Speech Movement of 1964, which permanently altered the political atmosphere on college campuses.
SDS's initial efforts at the promotion of civil rights, voting rights, and urban reform were gradually overshadowed by its focus on the Vietnam War. In April 1965, SDS advertised its opposition to the War by participating in the March on Washington.
Many key SDS members were "red-diaper babies," children of parents who were Communist Party members or Communist activists in the 1930s. In 1966, when President Lyndon Johnson abolished student draft deferments, some 300 new SDS chapters were formed. Among the organization's activities were: disrupting ROTC classes, staging draft card burnings, and harassing campus recruiters for the CIA and for firms that conducted research tied in some way to national defense. SDS also occupied buildings at universities such as Columbia and destroyed draft records.
At the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, SDS protestors, organized by Tom Hayden, created a riot in order to destroy the electoral chances of the pro-war liberal Hubert Humphrey, and thereby set the stage for a confrontation with the Nixon Administration over the Vietnam War. Hayden and his cohorts -- including Jerry Rubin, Abby Hoffman and Black Panther Bobby Seale -- were arrested and indicted for crossing state lines to incite a riot. They became known as The Chicago Seven. In a celebrated trial (whose guilty verdict was subsequently overturned on a technicality), they were given token sentences.
In 1969 SDS began imploding into factions. One of them, a group calling itself Weatherman, was elected to SDS leadership and proclaimed that the time had come to launch a race war on behalf of the Third World and against the United States. The new entity dissolved SDS and formed a terrorist cult in its place, which was given the name Weather Underground.
_______________________________
SDS: Students for Democratic Society
Students for Democratic Society (SDS) were part of the New Left, the student political movement that protested the Vietnam War in the United States.
Related Terms:
RED DIAPER BABIES--The children of people who had been active members of progressive, sometimes even radical, social movements during the 1930s (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.)
NEW LEFT--A political movement originating in the United States in the 1960s that actively advocated (as by demonstrations and education efforts) radical changes in prevailing social, political, and educational practices (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
LEAGUE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY--A socialist organization whose youth branch developed into Students for a Democratic Society (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT (FSM)--Student movement at the University of California, Berkeley, formed in 1964 to protest limitations on political activities on campus (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
COUNTERCULTURE--Various alternatives to mainstream values and behaviors that became popular in the 1960s, including experimentation with psychedelic drugs, communal living, a return to the land, Asian religions, and experimental art (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
WEATHER UNDERGROUND (WEATHERMEN)--Hardline, terroristic faction that split off from SDS in 1969 and went underground.
CHICAGO SEVEN-Seven young men who were arrested and tried as leaders of the antiwar protests at the Democratic National Convention in 1968.
____________________
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a radical youth group established in the United States in 1959, developed out of the youth branch of an older socialist educational organization, the League for Industrial Democracy. The newly formed SDS held its first organizational meeting in 1960 at Ann Arbor, Michigan, where Robert Alan Haber was elected president.
The political manifesto for SDS, the Port Huron Statement, was written for the most part by Tom Hayden, a twenty-two-year-old former editor of the student newspaper at the University of Michigan. The document, adopted in 1962 by the sixty or so founding members of SDS, criticized the American political system for failing to achieve international peace or to effectively address a myriad of social ills, including racism, materialism, militarism, poverty, and exploitation. The Port Huron Statement called for a fully “participatory democracy,” which would empower citizens to share in the social decisions that directly affected their lives and well-being. It was the founders’ fervent, if somewhat naïve, belief that a nonviolent youth movement could transform U.S. society into a model political system in which the people, rather than just the social elite, would control social policy.
At first SDS focused its efforts on helping to promote the civil rights movement and on efforts to improve conditions in urban ghettoes. In April of 1965, SDS organized a national march on Washington, D.C., and from that point on the movement grew increasingly militant, especially in its opposition to the Vietnam War, employing such tactics as rowdy (though not violent) demonstrations and occupation of administration buildings on college campuses. After 1965, SDS became known primarily for its leading role in the youth movement against the Vietnam War.
SDS was part of a more general youth movement aimed at correcting social injustice in the United States. The civil rights movement that led to the formation of SDS also precipitated another politicized youth movement, the Berkeley Free Speech Movement (FSM), led by a junior philosophy major named Mario Savio. Savio urged his generation to fight against the educational-corporate machine, “There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick to heart that . . . you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop.”
The Free Speech Movement arose as a reaction against the heavy-handed attempts by Berkeley officials, under pressure by prominent local conservatives, to prevent students from collecting donations and recruiting other students for work in the civil rights movement in the segregated South. Official overreaction to mild student resistance led to massive sit-ins and occupation of the university administration building. The arrest of over five hundred demonstrators led to several weeks of even more massive demonstrations and a strike by nearly 70 percent of the Berkeley student body.
The “countercultural” youth movement that SDS and the Free Speech Movement were such a prominent part of was driven by a radical minority of liberal-arts majors and graduate students attending some of the country’s most elite educational institutions. This campus political awakening, dubbed the “New Left,” developed around a core of “red-diaper babies,” the children of parents who were themselves politically active and who had participated in progressive, and even radical, social movements in the 1930s. It was, after all, the youth branch of a socialist organization that had evolved into SDS, and most of SDS’s early recruits were red-diaper babies.
The somewhat vague idealism and altruism of the early SDS is captured in the ringing declarations of the Port Huron Statement: “We would replace power rooted in possession, privilege or circumstances, with power rooted in love, reflectiveness, reason and creativity.” The Port Huron Statement also decried “the permeating and victimizing fact of human degradation, symbolized by the Southern struggle against racial bigotry. . . . [and] the enclosing fact of the Cold War, symbolized by the presence of the Bomb,” which drove the younger generation “as individuals to take responsibility for encounter and resolution.”
The campus activism heralded by the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and SDS’s Port Huron Statement soon spread to colleges and universities all over the United States. Even students who never joined SDS heeded the call to action embodied in the Port Huron Statement and other SDS manifestos. SDS also used a small grant from the United AutoWorkers union to initiate a campaign for grassroots political awakening in working-class neighborhoods. In Hayden’s and Savio’s rhetoric, thousands of students found the vision of a just society that motivated their resistance to what they saw as the impersonality, insensitivity, and rigidity of America’s educational institutions and of the society those institutions served.
Student protesters targeted many perceived injustices, focusing at first on loosening up the university culture itself. They demonstrated against racial discrimination in sororities and fraternities, dress codes, course requirements, and the grading system. They especially protested against university research that benefited the military-industrial complex.
When in January of 1966 President Lyndon Johnson’s administration announced it would abolish automatic student deferments from the draft, student anger over the escalation of the war in Vietnam became more personal and intense. SDS, as a leader of the New Left student movement, seized on antiwar sentiment to kindle a mass student movement. By the end of 1966, over three hundred new SDS chapters had been formed on campuses across the country.
The most popular of SDS’s rallying cries, “Make Love--Not War!” became the motto for the antiwar movement. SDS organized draft-card burnings and disruptions of ROTC classes. Campus recruiters for the military were hounded and harassed by large groups of student protesters. A massive SDS-orchestrated demonstration in New York’s Central Park, the Spring Mobilization to end the War in Vietnam (1969), drew half a million antiwar protesters. Chanting, “Burn cards, not people,” and “Hell, no we won’t go!” hundreds of young men threw their draft cards into a large bonfire.
In 1968, about forty thousand students on nearly a hundred campuses across the country demonstrated against the Vietnam War and against racism. Protest against one often morphed into protest against the other, as at Columbia University, where an antiracist demonstration developed into a huge protest against the war and against military research at the university. The administration building and other campus buildings were occupied by nearly a thousand angry students, who set up barricades and established “revolutionary communes” behind the barricades. When the police stormed the buildings and brutalized the occupying students, the moderate majority of students at Columbia joined in a boycott of classes that shut down the university.
During the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968, Mayor Daley’s police attacked five thousand antiwar demonstrators in what investigators would later term a “police riot.” Unfortunately, worse violence was yet to come. The most shocking incident was the unprovoked shooting by Ohio National Guardsmen of four students at Kent State University on 4 May 1970. Also in May, Mississippi state highway patrolmen investigating a student protest fired into a women’s dormitory at Jackson State College, killing two students and wounding eleven. These two incidents led to even more protests on college campuses, though by the time school resumed in the fall, the wave of protests had pretty much burned itself out.
As student activism subsided on the nation’s college campuses, SDS itself began to fall victim to its own internal divisions. Within the SDS organization, highly disciplined factions of hard-line followers of the revolutionary philosophies of Mao Zedong and Che Guevara began to take over the movement. By 1969 these factions were already in evidence. The most notorious of them was the Weather Underground, or Weathermen, which went underground to employ terrorist violence, thus providing the justification the FBI and other government agencies wanted to crack down on the New Left.
Other SDS factions withdrew from the national organization to focus their efforts on the Third World or on the now radicalized Black Power movement. As the Vietnam War began to enter its closing stages, SDS lost much of its rationale for national activism, and by the mid-1970s the organization was essentially dead.
Tom Hayden, the main author of the Port Huron Statement and one of the Chicago Seven, became a progressive politician and to this day remains active in California state politics. His political career is one of the few lasting effects of the movement SDS initiate to make the United States a more just and more humane society. Ironically, one other lasting effect was the right-wing backlash of the late 1970s and 1980s, in which newly politicized social and religious conservatives made use of grassroots organizing techniques borrowed from SDS to propel Ronald Reagan into the presidency and to enact a conservative agenda that rolled back many of the liberal programs and policies of the 1960s and early 1970s.
__________________________________________
Early life and career
Main article: Early life and career of Barack Obama
Obama was born on August 4, 1961, at the Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Obama, Sr., a Black Kenyan of Nyang’oma Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya, and Ann Dunham, a White American from Wichita, Kansas. His parents met while attending the University of Hawaii at Manoa, where his father was a foreign student.[4] They separated when he was two years old and later divorced.[5] Obama's father returned to Kenya and saw him only once more before dying in an automobile accident in 1982.[6] After her divorce, Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, and the family moved to Soetoro's home country of Indonesia in 1967, where Obama attended local schools in Jakarta until he was ten years old. He then returned to Honolulu to live with his maternal grandparents while attending Punahou School from the fifth grade in 1971 until his graduation from high school in 1979.[7] Obama's mother returned to Hawaii in 1972 for several years and then back to Indonesia for her fieldwork. She died of ovarian cancer in 1995.[8]
Following high school, Obama moved to Los Angeles, where he studied at Occidental College for two years.[9] He then transferred to Columbia University in New York City, where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations.[10] Obama graduated with a B.A. from Columbia in 1983, then worked for a year at the Business International Corporation[11] and then at the New York Public Interest Research Group.[12][13]
After four years in New York City, Obama moved to Chicago to work as a community organizer for three years from June 1985 to May 1988 as director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland (Roseland, West Pullman, and Riverdale) on Chicago's far South Side.[12][14] During his three years as the DCP's director, its staff grew from 1 to 13 and its annual budget grew from $70,000 to $400,000, with accomplishments including helping set up a job training program, a college preparatory tutoring program, and a tenants' rights organization in Altgeld Gardens.[15] Obama also worked as a consultant and instructor for the Gamaliel Foundation, a community organizing institute.[16] In mid-1988, he traveled for the first time to Europe for three weeks then Kenya for five weeks where he met many of his Kenyan relatives for the first time.[17]
Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988 and at the end of his first year was selected as an editor of the Harvard Law Review based on his grades and a writing competition.[18] In his second year he was elected president of the Law Review, a full-time volunteer position functioning as editor-in-chief and supervising the law review's staff of 80 editors.[19] Obama's election in February 1990 as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review was widely reported and followed by several long, detailed profiles.[19] He graduated with a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991 and returned to Chicago where he had worked as a summer associate at the law firms of Sidley & Austin in 1989 and Hopkins & Sutter in 1990.[18][20]
The publicity from his election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led to a contract and advance to write a book about race relations.[21] In an effort to recruit him to their faculty, the University of Chicago Law School provided Obama with a fellowship and an office to work on his book.[21] He originally planned to finish the book in one year, but it took much longer as the book evolved into a personal memoir. In order to work without interruptions, Obama and his wife, Michelle, traveled to Bali where he wrote for several months. The manuscript was finally published as Dreams from My Father in mid-1995.[21]
- Wikipedia -
________________________________________
2008 ELECTIONS:
Cyber_Warfare_HQ - BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
Ann Coulter – BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
SATWAR - BIOGRAPHY (http://www.blogger.com/profile/06880683584382683410)
• Documents
•
• Vietnam War
•
• Free Speech Movement (Berkeley), 1964. Extensive archives collection.
•
• Columbia University
•
• Kent State
•
• Other locations
•
• Weatherman/Weather Underground
•
• Books
•
• Movies
•
• SDS Graphics
•
• German SDS
•
http://www.sds.revolt.org/
_______________________________
* Radical student group during the 1960s
* Spearheaded the Anti-Vietnam War movement
* Was transformed into Weatherman, a terrorist cult
Forming the core of the 1960s counter-cultural movement known collectively as the New Left, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was a radical organization that aspired to overthrow America's democratic institutions, remake its government in a Marxist image, and help America's enemies defeat her sons on the battlefield in Vietnam. The group developed from the Student League for Industrial Democracy, the youth branch of the socialist League for Industrial Democracy.
Established in late 1959 by Aryeh Neier (Director of the socialist League for Industrial Democracy), SDS held its first meeting in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1960. Its first President was Alan Haber, and its first impress on the political landscape was the Port Huron Statement of 1962, drafted principally by Tom Hayden, a former editor of the University of Michigan's student newspaper. The Port Huron Statement adopted the position of "anti-anti-Communism," refusing to support the West in the Cold War. The statement denounced bigotry in the United States, world hunger and American abundance, materialism, personal alienation, industrialization, the threat of nuclear war, military spending, and the Cold War. Its prescribed solution to Cold War tensions reads as follows:
"Universal controlled disarmament must replace deterrence and arms control as the [American] national defense goal. ... It is necessary that America make disarmament, not nuclear deterrence, 'credible' to the Soviets and to the world. That is, disarmament should be continually avowed as a national goal; concrete plans should be presented at conference tables."
Calling for "participatory democracy," the Port Huron Statement continued: "[The] allocation of resources must be based on social needs. A truly 'public sector' must be established, and its nature debated and planned. At present the majority of America's 'public sector,' the largest part of our public spending is for the military. When great social needs are so pressing, our concept of 'government spending is wrapped up in the 'permanent war economy.'" The Statement promoted the politicization of the University, a call that was answered in Berkeley's Free Speech Movement of 1964, which permanently altered the political atmosphere on college campuses.
SDS's initial efforts at the promotion of civil rights, voting rights, and urban reform were gradually overshadowed by its focus on the Vietnam War. In April 1965, SDS advertised its opposition to the War by participating in the March on Washington.
Many key SDS members were "red-diaper babies," children of parents who were Communist Party members or Communist activists in the 1930s. In 1966, when President Lyndon Johnson abolished student draft deferments, some 300 new SDS chapters were formed. Among the organization's activities were: disrupting ROTC classes, staging draft card burnings, and harassing campus recruiters for the CIA and for firms that conducted research tied in some way to national defense. SDS also occupied buildings at universities such as Columbia and destroyed draft records.
At the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, SDS protestors, organized by Tom Hayden, created a riot in order to destroy the electoral chances of the pro-war liberal Hubert Humphrey, and thereby set the stage for a confrontation with the Nixon Administration over the Vietnam War. Hayden and his cohorts -- including Jerry Rubin, Abby Hoffman and Black Panther Bobby Seale -- were arrested and indicted for crossing state lines to incite a riot. They became known as The Chicago Seven. In a celebrated trial (whose guilty verdict was subsequently overturned on a technicality), they were given token sentences.
In 1969 SDS began imploding into factions. One of them, a group calling itself Weatherman, was elected to SDS leadership and proclaimed that the time had come to launch a race war on behalf of the Third World and against the United States. The new entity dissolved SDS and formed a terrorist cult in its place, which was given the name Weather Underground.
_______________________________
SDS: Students for Democratic Society
Students for Democratic Society (SDS) were part of the New Left, the student political movement that protested the Vietnam War in the United States.
Related Terms:
RED DIAPER BABIES--The children of people who had been active members of progressive, sometimes even radical, social movements during the 1930s (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.)
NEW LEFT--A political movement originating in the United States in the 1960s that actively advocated (as by demonstrations and education efforts) radical changes in prevailing social, political, and educational practices (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
LEAGUE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY--A socialist organization whose youth branch developed into Students for a Democratic Society (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT (FSM)--Student movement at the University of California, Berkeley, formed in 1964 to protest limitations on political activities on campus (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
COUNTERCULTURE--Various alternatives to mainstream values and behaviors that became popular in the 1960s, including experimentation with psychedelic drugs, communal living, a return to the land, Asian religions, and experimental art (Webster's Dictionary, 9th ed.).
WEATHER UNDERGROUND (WEATHERMEN)--Hardline, terroristic faction that split off from SDS in 1969 and went underground.
CHICAGO SEVEN-Seven young men who were arrested and tried as leaders of the antiwar protests at the Democratic National Convention in 1968.
____________________
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a radical youth group established in the United States in 1959, developed out of the youth branch of an older socialist educational organization, the League for Industrial Democracy. The newly formed SDS held its first organizational meeting in 1960 at Ann Arbor, Michigan, where Robert Alan Haber was elected president.
The political manifesto for SDS, the Port Huron Statement, was written for the most part by Tom Hayden, a twenty-two-year-old former editor of the student newspaper at the University of Michigan. The document, adopted in 1962 by the sixty or so founding members of SDS, criticized the American political system for failing to achieve international peace or to effectively address a myriad of social ills, including racism, materialism, militarism, poverty, and exploitation. The Port Huron Statement called for a fully “participatory democracy,” which would empower citizens to share in the social decisions that directly affected their lives and well-being. It was the founders’ fervent, if somewhat naïve, belief that a nonviolent youth movement could transform U.S. society into a model political system in which the people, rather than just the social elite, would control social policy.
At first SDS focused its efforts on helping to promote the civil rights movement and on efforts to improve conditions in urban ghettoes. In April of 1965, SDS organized a national march on Washington, D.C., and from that point on the movement grew increasingly militant, especially in its opposition to the Vietnam War, employing such tactics as rowdy (though not violent) demonstrations and occupation of administration buildings on college campuses. After 1965, SDS became known primarily for its leading role in the youth movement against the Vietnam War.
SDS was part of a more general youth movement aimed at correcting social injustice in the United States. The civil rights movement that led to the formation of SDS also precipitated another politicized youth movement, the Berkeley Free Speech Movement (FSM), led by a junior philosophy major named Mario Savio. Savio urged his generation to fight against the educational-corporate machine, “There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick to heart that . . . you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop.”
The Free Speech Movement arose as a reaction against the heavy-handed attempts by Berkeley officials, under pressure by prominent local conservatives, to prevent students from collecting donations and recruiting other students for work in the civil rights movement in the segregated South. Official overreaction to mild student resistance led to massive sit-ins and occupation of the university administration building. The arrest of over five hundred demonstrators led to several weeks of even more massive demonstrations and a strike by nearly 70 percent of the Berkeley student body.
The “countercultural” youth movement that SDS and the Free Speech Movement were such a prominent part of was driven by a radical minority of liberal-arts majors and graduate students attending some of the country’s most elite educational institutions. This campus political awakening, dubbed the “New Left,” developed around a core of “red-diaper babies,” the children of parents who were themselves politically active and who had participated in progressive, and even radical, social movements in the 1930s. It was, after all, the youth branch of a socialist organization that had evolved into SDS, and most of SDS’s early recruits were red-diaper babies.
The somewhat vague idealism and altruism of the early SDS is captured in the ringing declarations of the Port Huron Statement: “We would replace power rooted in possession, privilege or circumstances, with power rooted in love, reflectiveness, reason and creativity.” The Port Huron Statement also decried “the permeating and victimizing fact of human degradation, symbolized by the Southern struggle against racial bigotry. . . . [and] the enclosing fact of the Cold War, symbolized by the presence of the Bomb,” which drove the younger generation “as individuals to take responsibility for encounter and resolution.”
The campus activism heralded by the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and SDS’s Port Huron Statement soon spread to colleges and universities all over the United States. Even students who never joined SDS heeded the call to action embodied in the Port Huron Statement and other SDS manifestos. SDS also used a small grant from the United AutoWorkers union to initiate a campaign for grassroots political awakening in working-class neighborhoods. In Hayden’s and Savio’s rhetoric, thousands of students found the vision of a just society that motivated their resistance to what they saw as the impersonality, insensitivity, and rigidity of America’s educational institutions and of the society those institutions served.
Student protesters targeted many perceived injustices, focusing at first on loosening up the university culture itself. They demonstrated against racial discrimination in sororities and fraternities, dress codes, course requirements, and the grading system. They especially protested against university research that benefited the military-industrial complex.
When in January of 1966 President Lyndon Johnson’s administration announced it would abolish automatic student deferments from the draft, student anger over the escalation of the war in Vietnam became more personal and intense. SDS, as a leader of the New Left student movement, seized on antiwar sentiment to kindle a mass student movement. By the end of 1966, over three hundred new SDS chapters had been formed on campuses across the country.
The most popular of SDS’s rallying cries, “Make Love--Not War!” became the motto for the antiwar movement. SDS organized draft-card burnings and disruptions of ROTC classes. Campus recruiters for the military were hounded and harassed by large groups of student protesters. A massive SDS-orchestrated demonstration in New York’s Central Park, the Spring Mobilization to end the War in Vietnam (1969), drew half a million antiwar protesters. Chanting, “Burn cards, not people,” and “Hell, no we won’t go!” hundreds of young men threw their draft cards into a large bonfire.
In 1968, about forty thousand students on nearly a hundred campuses across the country demonstrated against the Vietnam War and against racism. Protest against one often morphed into protest against the other, as at Columbia University, where an antiracist demonstration developed into a huge protest against the war and against military research at the university. The administration building and other campus buildings were occupied by nearly a thousand angry students, who set up barricades and established “revolutionary communes” behind the barricades. When the police stormed the buildings and brutalized the occupying students, the moderate majority of students at Columbia joined in a boycott of classes that shut down the university.
During the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968, Mayor Daley’s police attacked five thousand antiwar demonstrators in what investigators would later term a “police riot.” Unfortunately, worse violence was yet to come. The most shocking incident was the unprovoked shooting by Ohio National Guardsmen of four students at Kent State University on 4 May 1970. Also in May, Mississippi state highway patrolmen investigating a student protest fired into a women’s dormitory at Jackson State College, killing two students and wounding eleven. These two incidents led to even more protests on college campuses, though by the time school resumed in the fall, the wave of protests had pretty much burned itself out.
As student activism subsided on the nation’s college campuses, SDS itself began to fall victim to its own internal divisions. Within the SDS organization, highly disciplined factions of hard-line followers of the revolutionary philosophies of Mao Zedong and Che Guevara began to take over the movement. By 1969 these factions were already in evidence. The most notorious of them was the Weather Underground, or Weathermen, which went underground to employ terrorist violence, thus providing the justification the FBI and other government agencies wanted to crack down on the New Left.
Other SDS factions withdrew from the national organization to focus their efforts on the Third World or on the now radicalized Black Power movement. As the Vietnam War began to enter its closing stages, SDS lost much of its rationale for national activism, and by the mid-1970s the organization was essentially dead.
Tom Hayden, the main author of the Port Huron Statement and one of the Chicago Seven, became a progressive politician and to this day remains active in California state politics. His political career is one of the few lasting effects of the movement SDS initiate to make the United States a more just and more humane society. Ironically, one other lasting effect was the right-wing backlash of the late 1970s and 1980s, in which newly politicized social and religious conservatives made use of grassroots organizing techniques borrowed from SDS to propel Ronald Reagan into the presidency and to enact a conservative agenda that rolled back many of the liberal programs and policies of the 1960s and early 1970s.
__________________________________________
Early life and career
Main article: Early life and career of Barack Obama
Obama was born on August 4, 1961, at the Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Obama, Sr., a Black Kenyan of Nyang’oma Kogelo, Siaya District, Kenya, and Ann Dunham, a White American from Wichita, Kansas. His parents met while attending the University of Hawaii at Manoa, where his father was a foreign student.[4] They separated when he was two years old and later divorced.[5] Obama's father returned to Kenya and saw him only once more before dying in an automobile accident in 1982.[6] After her divorce, Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, and the family moved to Soetoro's home country of Indonesia in 1967, where Obama attended local schools in Jakarta until he was ten years old. He then returned to Honolulu to live with his maternal grandparents while attending Punahou School from the fifth grade in 1971 until his graduation from high school in 1979.[7] Obama's mother returned to Hawaii in 1972 for several years and then back to Indonesia for her fieldwork. She died of ovarian cancer in 1995.[8]
Following high school, Obama moved to Los Angeles, where he studied at Occidental College for two years.[9] He then transferred to Columbia University in New York City, where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations.[10] Obama graduated with a B.A. from Columbia in 1983, then worked for a year at the Business International Corporation[11] and then at the New York Public Interest Research Group.[12][13]
After four years in New York City, Obama moved to Chicago to work as a community organizer for three years from June 1985 to May 1988 as director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland (Roseland, West Pullman, and Riverdale) on Chicago's far South Side.[12][14] During his three years as the DCP's director, its staff grew from 1 to 13 and its annual budget grew from $70,000 to $400,000, with accomplishments including helping set up a job training program, a college preparatory tutoring program, and a tenants' rights organization in Altgeld Gardens.[15] Obama also worked as a consultant and instructor for the Gamaliel Foundation, a community organizing institute.[16] In mid-1988, he traveled for the first time to Europe for three weeks then Kenya for five weeks where he met many of his Kenyan relatives for the first time.[17]
Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988 and at the end of his first year was selected as an editor of the Harvard Law Review based on his grades and a writing competition.[18] In his second year he was elected president of the Law Review, a full-time volunteer position functioning as editor-in-chief and supervising the law review's staff of 80 editors.[19] Obama's election in February 1990 as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review was widely reported and followed by several long, detailed profiles.[19] He graduated with a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991 and returned to Chicago where he had worked as a summer associate at the law firms of Sidley & Austin in 1989 and Hopkins & Sutter in 1990.[18][20]
The publicity from his election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led to a contract and advance to write a book about race relations.[21] In an effort to recruit him to their faculty, the University of Chicago Law School provided Obama with a fellowship and an office to work on his book.[21] He originally planned to finish the book in one year, but it took much longer as the book evolved into a personal memoir. In order to work without interruptions, Obama and his wife, Michelle, traveled to Bali where he wrote for several months. The manuscript was finally published as Dreams from My Father in mid-1995.[21]
- Wikipedia -
________________________________________
2008 ELECTIONS:
Cyber_Warfare_HQ - BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
Ann Coulter – BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
SATWAR - BIOGRAPHY (http://www.blogger.com/profile/06880683584382683410)
MISSING: REPORTS ON SDS FROM COLLEGE (REPORT DATE: 1989 NIGHTSCHOOL)
Reports which were the original reports on SDI (Students for a Democratic Soceity) and the 1960s Counter Coulter and anti-Vietnam and anti-Pentagon sentiments are MIA. Here is what they analyzed and were about. The date on these reports were 1989 while in night school.
(From: http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/huron.html)
Port Huron Statement of the Students for a Democratic Society, 1962
Courtesy Office of Sen. Tom Hayden.
THE PORT HURON STATEMENT OF THE STUDENTS FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introductory Note: This document represents the results of several months of writing and discussion among the membership, a draft paper, and revision by the Students for a Democratic Society national convention meeting in \cf2 Port Huron\cf0 , Michigan, June 11-15, 1962. It is represented as a document with which SDS officially identifies, but also as a living document open to change with our times and experiences. It is a beginning: in our own debate and education, in our dialogue with society.
published and distributed by Students for a Democratic Society 112 East 19 Street New York 3, New York GRamercy 3-2181
INTRODUCTION: AGENDA FOR A GENERATION
We are people of this generation, bred in at least modest comfort, housed now in universities, looking uncomfortably to the world we inherit.
When we were kids the United States was the wealthiest and strongest country in the world: the only one with the atom bomb, the least scarred by modern war, an initiator of the United Nations that we thought would distribute Western influence throughout the world. Freedom and equality for each individual, government of, by, and for the people -- these American values we found good, principles by which we could live as men. Many of us began maturing in complacency.
As we grew, however, our comfort was penetrated by events too troubling to dismiss. First, the permeating and victimizing fact of human degradation, symbolized by the Southern struggle against racial bigotry, compelled most of us from silence to activism. Second, the enclosing fact of the Cold War, symbolized by the presence of the Bomb, brought awareness that we ourselves, and our friends, and millions of abstract "others" we knew more directly because of our common peril, might die at any time. We might deliberately ignore, or avoid, or fail to feel all other human problems, but not these two, for these were too immediate and crushing in their impact, too challenging in the demand that we as individuals take the responsibility for encounter and resolution.
While these and other problems either directly oppressed us or rankled our consciences and became our own subjective concerns, we began to see complicated and disturbing paradoxes in our surrounding America. The declaration "all men are created equal . . . rang hollow before the facts of Negro life in the South and the big cities of the North. The proclaimed peaceful intentions of the United States contradicted its economic and military investments in the Cold War status quo.
We witnessed, and continue to witness, other paradoxes. With nuclear energy whole cities can easily be powered, yet the dominant nationstates seem more likely to unleash destruction greater than that incurred in all wars of human history. Although our own technology is destroying old and creating new forms of social organization, men still tolerate meaningless work and idleness. While two-thirds of mankind suffers undernourishment, our own upper classes revel amidst superfluous abundance. Although world population is expected to double in forty years, the nations still tolerate anarchy as a major principle of international conduct and uncontrolled exploitation governs the sapping of the earth's physical resources. Although mankind desperately needs revolutionary leadership, America rests in national stalemate, its goals ambiguous and tradition-bound instead of informed and clear, its democratic system apathetic and manipulated rather than "of, by, and for the people."
Not only did tarnish appear on our image of American virtue, not only did disillusion occur when the hypocrisy of American ideals was discovered, but we began to sense that what we had originally seen as the American Golden Age was actually the decline of an era. The worldwide outbreak of revolution against colonialism and imperialism, the entrenchment of totalitarian states, the menace of war, overpopulation, international disorder, supertechnology -- these trends were testing the tenacity of our own commitment to democracy and freedom and our abilities to visualize their application to a world in upheaval.
Our work is guided by the sense that we may be the last generation in the experiment with living. But we are a minority -- the vast majority of our people regard the temporary equilibriums of our society and world as eternally-functional parts. In this is perhaps the outstanding paradox: we ourselves are imbued with urgency, yet the message of our society is that there is no viable alternative to the present. Beneath the reassuring tones of the politicians, beneath the common opinion that America will "muddle through", beneath the stagnation of those who have closed their minds to the future, is the pervading feeling that there simply are no alternatives, that our times have witnessed the exhaustion not only of Utopias, but of any new departures as well. Feeling the press of complexity upon the emptiness of life, people are fearful of the thought that at any moment things might thrust out of control. They fear change itself, since change might smash whatever invisible framework seems to hold back chaos for them now. For most Americans, all crusades are suspect, threatening. The fact that each individual sees apathy in his fellows perpetuates the common reluctance to organize for change. The dominant institutions are complex enough to blunt the minds of their potential critics, and entrenched enough to swiftly dissipate or entirely repel the energies of protest and reform, thus limiting human expectancies. Then, too, we are a materially improved society, and by our own improvements we seem to have weakened the case for further change.
Some would have us believe that Americans feel contentment amidst prosperity -- but might it not better be called a glaze above deeplyfelt anxieties about their role in the new world? And if these anxieties produce a developed indifference to human affairs, do they not as well produce a yearning to believe there is an alternative to the present, that something can be done to change circumstances in the school, the workplaces, the bureaucracies, the government? It is to this latter yearning, at once the spark and engine of change, that we direct our present appeal. The search for truly democratic alternatives to the present, and a commitment to social experimentation with them, is a worthy and fulfilling human enterprise, one which moves us and, we hope, others today. On such a basis do we offer this document of our convictions and analysis: as an effort in understanding and changing the conditions of humanity in the late twentieth century, an effort rooted in the ancient, still unfulfilled conception of man attaining determining influence over his circumstances of life.
Values
________________________________________
2008 ELECTIONS:
Cyber_Warfare_HQ - BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
Ann Coulter – BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
SATWAR - BIOGRAPHY (http://www.blogger.com/profile/06880683584382683410)
(From: http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/huron.html)
Port Huron Statement of the Students for a Democratic Society, 1962
Courtesy Office of Sen. Tom Hayden.
THE PORT HURON STATEMENT OF THE STUDENTS FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introductory Note: This document represents the results of several months of writing and discussion among the membership, a draft paper, and revision by the Students for a Democratic Society national convention meeting in \cf2 Port Huron\cf0 , Michigan, June 11-15, 1962. It is represented as a document with which SDS officially identifies, but also as a living document open to change with our times and experiences. It is a beginning: in our own debate and education, in our dialogue with society.
published and distributed by Students for a Democratic Society 112 East 19 Street New York 3, New York GRamercy 3-2181
INTRODUCTION: AGENDA FOR A GENERATION
We are people of this generation, bred in at least modest comfort, housed now in universities, looking uncomfortably to the world we inherit.
When we were kids the United States was the wealthiest and strongest country in the world: the only one with the atom bomb, the least scarred by modern war, an initiator of the United Nations that we thought would distribute Western influence throughout the world. Freedom and equality for each individual, government of, by, and for the people -- these American values we found good, principles by which we could live as men. Many of us began maturing in complacency.
As we grew, however, our comfort was penetrated by events too troubling to dismiss. First, the permeating and victimizing fact of human degradation, symbolized by the Southern struggle against racial bigotry, compelled most of us from silence to activism. Second, the enclosing fact of the Cold War, symbolized by the presence of the Bomb, brought awareness that we ourselves, and our friends, and millions of abstract "others" we knew more directly because of our common peril, might die at any time. We might deliberately ignore, or avoid, or fail to feel all other human problems, but not these two, for these were too immediate and crushing in their impact, too challenging in the demand that we as individuals take the responsibility for encounter and resolution.
While these and other problems either directly oppressed us or rankled our consciences and became our own subjective concerns, we began to see complicated and disturbing paradoxes in our surrounding America. The declaration "all men are created equal . . . rang hollow before the facts of Negro life in the South and the big cities of the North. The proclaimed peaceful intentions of the United States contradicted its economic and military investments in the Cold War status quo.
We witnessed, and continue to witness, other paradoxes. With nuclear energy whole cities can easily be powered, yet the dominant nationstates seem more likely to unleash destruction greater than that incurred in all wars of human history. Although our own technology is destroying old and creating new forms of social organization, men still tolerate meaningless work and idleness. While two-thirds of mankind suffers undernourishment, our own upper classes revel amidst superfluous abundance. Although world population is expected to double in forty years, the nations still tolerate anarchy as a major principle of international conduct and uncontrolled exploitation governs the sapping of the earth's physical resources. Although mankind desperately needs revolutionary leadership, America rests in national stalemate, its goals ambiguous and tradition-bound instead of informed and clear, its democratic system apathetic and manipulated rather than "of, by, and for the people."
Not only did tarnish appear on our image of American virtue, not only did disillusion occur when the hypocrisy of American ideals was discovered, but we began to sense that what we had originally seen as the American Golden Age was actually the decline of an era. The worldwide outbreak of revolution against colonialism and imperialism, the entrenchment of totalitarian states, the menace of war, overpopulation, international disorder, supertechnology -- these trends were testing the tenacity of our own commitment to democracy and freedom and our abilities to visualize their application to a world in upheaval.
Our work is guided by the sense that we may be the last generation in the experiment with living. But we are a minority -- the vast majority of our people regard the temporary equilibriums of our society and world as eternally-functional parts. In this is perhaps the outstanding paradox: we ourselves are imbued with urgency, yet the message of our society is that there is no viable alternative to the present. Beneath the reassuring tones of the politicians, beneath the common opinion that America will "muddle through", beneath the stagnation of those who have closed their minds to the future, is the pervading feeling that there simply are no alternatives, that our times have witnessed the exhaustion not only of Utopias, but of any new departures as well. Feeling the press of complexity upon the emptiness of life, people are fearful of the thought that at any moment things might thrust out of control. They fear change itself, since change might smash whatever invisible framework seems to hold back chaos for them now. For most Americans, all crusades are suspect, threatening. The fact that each individual sees apathy in his fellows perpetuates the common reluctance to organize for change. The dominant institutions are complex enough to blunt the minds of their potential critics, and entrenched enough to swiftly dissipate or entirely repel the energies of protest and reform, thus limiting human expectancies. Then, too, we are a materially improved society, and by our own improvements we seem to have weakened the case for further change.
Some would have us believe that Americans feel contentment amidst prosperity -- but might it not better be called a glaze above deeplyfelt anxieties about their role in the new world? And if these anxieties produce a developed indifference to human affairs, do they not as well produce a yearning to believe there is an alternative to the present, that something can be done to change circumstances in the school, the workplaces, the bureaucracies, the government? It is to this latter yearning, at once the spark and engine of change, that we direct our present appeal. The search for truly democratic alternatives to the present, and a commitment to social experimentation with them, is a worthy and fulfilling human enterprise, one which moves us and, we hope, others today. On such a basis do we offer this document of our convictions and analysis: as an effort in understanding and changing the conditions of humanity in the late twentieth century, an effort rooted in the ancient, still unfulfilled conception of man attaining determining influence over his circumstances of life.
Values
________________________________________
2008 ELECTIONS:
Cyber_Warfare_HQ - BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
Ann Coulter – BIOGRAPHY (http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/)
SATWAR - BIOGRAPHY (http://www.blogger.com/profile/06880683584382683410)
Sunday, August 3, 2008
THE NEW KILLING SEASON IN POLITICAL CIRCLES
Slander and dime store Khmer Rouge is the new killing season in political circles. Apparently, slander is no longer the business of liberals. Let me see if anyone can define conservatism and if so, please correct “US” at your freedom and constitutionality. “We” apologize if education slanders liberals but that is the basis of conservatism and liberalism. Conservatism is the affirmation that liberalism is nothing more than slander and in order to prove slander there are two ingredients. The first is the truth and the second is a negative impact or action. Conservatism does not anger the truth nor slanders the principle, quite the contrary; it is liberalism that is the dumbest act in history and the dividing line between conservatives and the idea behind conservatism. The business of liberals is to slander conservatives and capitalism, not the reverse. They hijack the movement and this is how they got the party started.
Website www.ronaldreagan.com (Note: the sight of former President Ronald Reagan and last bastion of conservatives). The entire movement has been hijacked and is being occupied by fakes or some rogue and they lack the understanding to either argue or espouse conservative ideas. If and when the conservatives loose touch with the truth or resort to low IQ conservatism, then slander will become their BS also. Slander is the business of liberals and it is profitable, now it is the staple of conservatism or so they are trying to rewrite it. So we get the dumbest act on the planet now on this other side. (Are this Rush, GW, Rove, and the straight talk express behind this or who is behind it?) Who are the sales people who are making such a forcible entry similar to a dime store Khmer Rouge conservative? This will define the last ten years and the seepage of this problem or the inability to contain it because it is getting bigger and larger.
Threatening the idea of conservatism or hijacking it? In two days, two "Super Moderators (Hane, Liberty, Fuzzball, and Andophiroxia) on a conservative sight send some warning message of banning." All sent a message about coming to the sight and how it was not able to pull off an act. Apparently, the conservatives are in the business of Slander now and not just liberals. These are the top moderators on the site and also this ongoing battle with conservatives who only have a High School education. The entire conservative movement is a “dime store Khmer Rouge” party of overweight and flawed fakes who are now in the business of slandering others which is the business of liberals. They are too weak for the movement itself and wish to only control and turn it into a “dime store Khmer Rouge” liberal party where they judge favoritism on the lower form of IQ, thus labor and unions.
You have been banned for the following reason: (Two days and 4 super moderators)
Banned for one year for lying and for wearing tin foil hats in the house.
Date the ban will be lifted: 08-03-2009, 05:30 PM
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
This is who we were dealing with and why they are implicated as a spy ring and a terrorist cell that we had implicated and wanted us gone. We can now put all the pieces together and all the experience of living under and so close to this breed of inferior human we know as liberals who created a new political class of human beings called the political breed of jackasses. This slander express and cannibal express is not only full of hate and deceit, but they want to be acknowledged as your friendly and peaceful libel liberal. Is coming to a local, state, and federal box office near you and they will reveal their next best slander and scam. When all is said and done, the one who will be holding the bag of liberal scrotum will be the conservatives and the Republican, what we know to be the bastion of right wing and the last line of defense against the cannibal express.
That bag of liberal scrotum is dangerous and it can cost this nation the inability to mobilize the best and the brightest. In other words, this could have cost many defections and squandering of talent while their brand of affirmative action refuses the merits of breathing in what their Mayflower Compact cost this nation in terms of the unborn. Their slander prevented talent from eradicating the enemy which we know to be a breed of coward who ambush us with a slanderous game of “who likes who or who made you.”
Their brand of inferior religion washed on these shores to breed, feed, rumor and gossip, and take a sweeping negation of capitalism while our enemies began to swarm and surround this ambush of anti-communism. We know the liberals to be excellent cowards and excellent traders and now we have a first class ticket on their slander express and cannibal-balls express. This is your slandering trader and who we know to be a coward and weak on communism. We have a first hand view of their Mayflower Compact and their little plot of the political future.
Once again, they will end up preventing our best and brightest from defeating the enemies while they set up the slander express to ambush the next best thing their scams and hoax can feed on like a predator. This is the coward, this is the slander express, this is your inferior breed, this is your elite jackass liberal predator, this is your friendly peaceful hateful slug, and this is your trader now is wishing to fight and have been implicated as not considering any means to their ends. Not even homicidal cold blooded murder. To they deny this or do they wish to perpetuate it so the world can see and to spread this liberal express which is ambushing the future and the way history is written? This could have cost priceless lives.
Website www.ronaldreagan.com (Note: the sight of former President Ronald Reagan and last bastion of conservatives). The entire movement has been hijacked and is being occupied by fakes or some rogue and they lack the understanding to either argue or espouse conservative ideas. If and when the conservatives loose touch with the truth or resort to low IQ conservatism, then slander will become their BS also. Slander is the business of liberals and it is profitable, now it is the staple of conservatism or so they are trying to rewrite it. So we get the dumbest act on the planet now on this other side. (Are this Rush, GW, Rove, and the straight talk express behind this or who is behind it?) Who are the sales people who are making such a forcible entry similar to a dime store Khmer Rouge conservative? This will define the last ten years and the seepage of this problem or the inability to contain it because it is getting bigger and larger.
Threatening the idea of conservatism or hijacking it? In two days, two "Super Moderators (Hane, Liberty, Fuzzball, and Andophiroxia) on a conservative sight send some warning message of banning." All sent a message about coming to the sight and how it was not able to pull off an act. Apparently, the conservatives are in the business of Slander now and not just liberals. These are the top moderators on the site and also this ongoing battle with conservatives who only have a High School education. The entire conservative movement is a “dime store Khmer Rouge” party of overweight and flawed fakes who are now in the business of slandering others which is the business of liberals. They are too weak for the movement itself and wish to only control and turn it into a “dime store Khmer Rouge” liberal party where they judge favoritism on the lower form of IQ, thus labor and unions.
You have been banned for the following reason: (Two days and 4 super moderators)
Banned for one year for lying and for wearing tin foil hats in the house.
Date the ban will be lifted: 08-03-2009, 05:30 PM
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
This is who we were dealing with and why they are implicated as a spy ring and a terrorist cell that we had implicated and wanted us gone. We can now put all the pieces together and all the experience of living under and so close to this breed of inferior human we know as liberals who created a new political class of human beings called the political breed of jackasses. This slander express and cannibal express is not only full of hate and deceit, but they want to be acknowledged as your friendly and peaceful libel liberal. Is coming to a local, state, and federal box office near you and they will reveal their next best slander and scam. When all is said and done, the one who will be holding the bag of liberal scrotum will be the conservatives and the Republican, what we know to be the bastion of right wing and the last line of defense against the cannibal express.
That bag of liberal scrotum is dangerous and it can cost this nation the inability to mobilize the best and the brightest. In other words, this could have cost many defections and squandering of talent while their brand of affirmative action refuses the merits of breathing in what their Mayflower Compact cost this nation in terms of the unborn. Their slander prevented talent from eradicating the enemy which we know to be a breed of coward who ambush us with a slanderous game of “who likes who or who made you.”
Their brand of inferior religion washed on these shores to breed, feed, rumor and gossip, and take a sweeping negation of capitalism while our enemies began to swarm and surround this ambush of anti-communism. We know the liberals to be excellent cowards and excellent traders and now we have a first class ticket on their slander express and cannibal-balls express. This is your slandering trader and who we know to be a coward and weak on communism. We have a first hand view of their Mayflower Compact and their little plot of the political future.
Once again, they will end up preventing our best and brightest from defeating the enemies while they set up the slander express to ambush the next best thing their scams and hoax can feed on like a predator. This is the coward, this is the slander express, this is your inferior breed, this is your elite jackass liberal predator, this is your friendly peaceful hateful slug, and this is your trader now is wishing to fight and have been implicated as not considering any means to their ends. Not even homicidal cold blooded murder. To they deny this or do they wish to perpetuate it so the world can see and to spread this liberal express which is ambushing the future and the way history is written? This could have cost priceless lives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- CYBER_WARFARE_HQ
- My name is Alex. I am the father of both cyber and satellite warfare. I was retired from the US Army at a very young age. Life has been grand I think. I love a girl named "GOO" who I have not seen in over 7 years, I hope to find her again one day. My book, which may end up several books is called "Cyber and Satellite Warfare, By Way of Insanity" will be out soon. It is the last book anyone will need to read. They began as military manuals and transgressed to just a good read. I am the real and authentic father of both cyber and satellite warfare and this is as real as it will ever get. What you are reading are only several chosen chapters out of hundreds of chapters. Specifically, this book was written between 1989 and 1998 while in college and while in my mid twenties. I am in my mid 30s now. I am not sure if I will write a biography, I want to wait and include someone in it, it is boring now. CLICK ON FULL PROFILE FOR MORE READING. Right now we are trying to lock them up and issue the death penalty on all of them.